Share this article Share Canada has this year voted to legalise cannabis and recreational marijuana sales became legal in California on January 1 this year, following a number of other US states. The battle is effectively over. What are the rules on street drugs and medical treatments? Conviction for possession can attract a five year prison sentence and an unlimited fine.
The call for the present drug laws to be changed has come from many quarters. The legalisation debate The debate itself can be broken down into three key elements: Civil liberties versus the duty of the state; The harm caused by drugs and enforcing prohibition; The way a legalised regime would be managed.
Civil liberties Freedom to use The degree to which the state is justified in interfering in the private life of the citizen thereby restricting freedom of choice is hotly debated.
Cannabis and other drugs are often regarded as providing a ‘gateway’ to more or problematic drug use. This is known as escalation theory. All that can be said is that most people who use heroin will have previously used cannabis (though only a small proportion of those who try cannabis go on to use heroin). Difficult one; some "recreational" drugs should never be legalized - cocaine (because it can easily be turned into crack), heroin & Crystal Meth. I don't honestly know about LSD, either way, LSD isn't a wide spread problem, legalizing might increase its use. If the recreational drug market was legalized and regulated, all drugs in the market would be manufactured and sold by regulated, certified and taxed corporations, either private or government-owned. Additionally, any recreational drugs that would get to the market would have to be certified by the government, and would only contain what they.
The principle of personal choice is applied to a wide range of private activities and why not drug use? Duty to protect On the other hand, if by using drugs, an individual is causing significant harm to themselves or others, the state can rightfully seek to counteract that harm.
Compulsory wearing of seatbelts is an example. In legislating against drug use, the government is seen to be discouraging a potentially harmful behaviour. Legalising any drug would be sending out the message to society that intoxication is a sanctioned behaviour.
Harm Health impact Increasingly health is cited as the main reason for prohibition. The latest international review of cannabis by the World Health Organisation highlights dangers such as lung and throat cancer, and increasing incidence of mental health problems due to prolonged heavy use in a minority of users.
The harm of current laws While the drug laws are there to prevent what the government sees as harmful behaviour, some see them as harmful in themselves. They are seen as making users criminals, creating strong and lucrative black markets and stigmatising those who need help the most — the addict.
How would legalisation be managed? Crucial to the debate on legalisation are the issues around the practicalities of one situation over another. On the one hand making drugs legal and more available will result in more use and so increasing the incidence of harmful side effects — at great cost to society.
On the other hand, removing a black market could raise drug related revenues to the government, save on police costs and help regulate the sale and consumption of drugs through regulated sales as is done with alcohol. This is known as escalation theory. All that can be said is that most people who use heroin will have previously used cannabis though only a small proportion of those who try cannabis go on to use heroin.
This could be because cannabis actually does at least for some people lead to heroin use, but there are alternative explanations. People tend to use cannabis first simply because they come across it first. Therapeutic use Another dimension to the reform debate has been the use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes.
The British Medical Association has leant its support to calls for further research and the legal sale of drugs derived from cannabis has now begun. GW Pharmaceuticals, which specialises in developing clinical drugs from cannabis, has produced Sativex, a cannabinoid medicine approved in the UK for the treatment of spasticity due to Multiple Sclerosis.Should recreational drugs be legalized essay 24 noviembre, Todo lo que necesitas saber antes de comprar un concentrador de oxígeno 2 agosto, Los top 3 concentradores de oxígeno del mercado 6 enero, That's understandable: Different drugs do carry different risks, and the potential for serious harm from marijuana is less than for cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine.
If the recreational drug market was legalized and regulated, all drugs in the market would be manufactured and sold by regulated, certified and taxed corporations, either private or government-owned. Additionally, any recreational drugs that would get to the market would have to be certified by the government, and would only contain what they claim to contain.
Consideration should also be given to whether the harm drugs cause, which may not be great for many users, warrants the government’s intervention.
The harm of current laws While the drug laws are there to prevent what the government sees as harmful behaviour, some see them as harmful in themselves.
Nov 20, · Should We Legalize Drugs? Colorado and Washington recently voted to legalize the recreational use of marijuana. Supporters say that will generate . All Drugs Should be Legal for Personal Use Essay - All Drugs Should be Legal for Personal Use The war on drugs is costing us over billion dollars to fight each year, and we’re only fighting a monster which we are making bigger with each punch.